Shirtless Crackhead Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 Dialectics as a Foundation for a Dynamic Non-equilibrium Monetary Economics More to follow. Danger Notes (Part 1) -The essential question of value = "How do we create more outputs than inputs." aka (Where doth Profit originate from, nigga.)-Economics shouldn't be simplified to thermodynamics, but it must be consistent with thermodynamics.-The strict interpretation of the "labor theory of value" is incompatible with the laws of thermodynamics.-Marx's dialectics provide an alternative theory to the one aforementioned, that is more workable. It is conceivable that a philosopher should be guilty of this or that inconsistency because of this or that compromise; he may himself be conscious of it. But what he is not conscious of is that in the last analysis this apparent compromise is made possibly by the deficiency of his principals or an inadequate grasp of them. So if a philosopher really has compromised it is the job of his followers to use the inner core of his thought to illuminate his own superficial expressions of it. - From Marx's notes on his own doctoral dissertation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUMERIAN BLOOD GOD Posted January 28, 2016 Report Share Posted January 28, 2016 hits blunt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Py687 Posted January 29, 2016 Report Share Posted January 29, 2016 blunts hit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORTOKtheSTRONG Posted February 14, 2016 Report Share Posted February 14, 2016 denk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.