SUMERIAN BLOOD GOD Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 http://i50.tinypic.com/xnywj7.jpg http://i49.tinypic.com/2r3yrr5.jpg New gun. Walther P22 in .22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted June 25, 2012 Report Share Posted June 25, 2012 http://i.imgur.com/MrwSL.jpg If you had one of these, you'd be really cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUMERIAN BLOOD GOD Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 http://i45.tinypic.com/zkn895.jpg Until the time comes that I can justify spending like $500 for a suppressor, this will have to do. I might end up putting a Weaver mount and a Burris dot on it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUNG MASTERLESS GLENCOUR Posted July 5, 2012 Report Share Posted July 5, 2012 k-swaggin' it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Putting a flash-hider on a 22, I'm oddly ok with this. http://i.imgur.com/yPUxx.jpg The guy who owns this gun sold it, I almost would have been getting a price for it, but someone beat me to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUMERIAN BLOOD GOD Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 Yeah I was buying a spare mag for the 22 and I saw that flash hider and thought "huh." It wasn't expensive and it came with the part I'd need if I ever want to fit a suppressor so I said fuck it and got it too. I'll be going to a range sometime this weekend. Probably to a fucking indoor range. It's hot as dick right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUNG MASTERLESS GLENCOUR Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 I want to go to range with you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 6, 2012 Report Share Posted July 6, 2012 I want to go to the range with you. Fix'd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 11, 2012 Report Share Posted July 11, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 26, 2012 Report Share Posted July 26, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUNG MASTERLESS GLENCOUR Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Great video, Raor. Man that's not even that far from here, I could drive out to that. Hell, I might. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUMERIAN BLOOD GOD Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 Proposed bill amendment banning high-capacity magazines Basically, any magazine capable of holding ten or more rounds would be illegal for civilian ownership. This applies to both handguns and rifles but attached tubular .22 magazines are excluded. The penalty for possession of the mags is an unspecified fine and/or a term of not more than 10 years in prison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 If that happens, I'm out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakuhatsu Pengin Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 its already happens in california what are gun laws like in canadia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 http://panda.com/canadaguns/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUNG MASTERLESS GLENCOUR Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 (edited) Yeah noob is right, those clips are already banned here. Although I thought we were allowed to have 12 round clips for 9mm and stuff? I might be mixing that up with police issue shit though...wouldn't be the first time. Edited July 31, 2012 by Penguin Deus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 http://outfitterlife.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/magazine-vs-clip.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YUNG MASTERLESS GLENCOUR Posted July 31, 2012 Report Share Posted July 31, 2012 magazine, my bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORTOKtheSTRONG Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 i lost interest when i saw that it wasnt bullpupmasterrace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 DEAL WITH IT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORTOKtheSTRONG Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 that's pure propaganda, way to use biased sources Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 (edited) Here's a guy I like, who comes to the defense of bullpups. Now, he has very valid points about reloads. But it forgets one huge thing. Try doing those reloads with kit on, it ain't gonna happen. Also reloads in the prone are more wonky. They can be done, but it's not as "ergonomic" as people who are bullpup fans would like to think. Also, shoulder transitions are impossible unless you have a forward ejecting rifle like the F2000 by FNH. You can look up vids like , with the QBZ-95, a gun of which I know you're a fan. And you can do reloads in skimpy airsoft swat style vests. But if you stack armor, radio, mags, and other modern infantry equipment on a guy, bullpups become an immediate liability. What are the advantages? Longer barrels in shorter packages? For the most part, that isn't an issue. Collapsing stock M4's are plenty compact enough to get in and out of shit now. It's not like hallways are going to get magically smaller. The whole point about balance is also null and void, as modern infantry rifles are gonna get tricked out with doo-dads like optics, night vision lasers, lights, grenade launchers, suppressors, etc.. Bullpups have their niche, and not all bullpups are identical. However, rear-box magazine fed, side-ejecting bullpups provide no significant advantage without disadvantages that outweigh them. The important thing to focus on here, is that they have their NICHE. Bullpups are not going to make good general purpose combat rifles, that doesn't mean certain conditions wouldn't be more suited towards having a bullpup. It just means they're not going to be good general purpose service rifles. http://nimga.com/m/uvL26.gif The only reason the Chinese developed their own weapon and caliber, is a strategic decision that they didn't want to have an army with ammunition that can be used by non-military personnel; generally speaking. Stolen QBZ-95's and such can use 5.8mm ammo, but you can't buy 5.8mm ammo or weapons chambered in it if you're not the PLA. It's an intelligent decision, the choice of going bullpup however, not so much. The Chinese are decades behind the US in small unit tactics, CQB, MOUT, Urban Warfare, and general combat experience/training methodology. EDIT: Forgot a link. Edited November 7, 2012 by Enganacious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KORTOKtheSTRONG Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 you're forgetting the other countries that use them you're also forgetting that 1.3 billion people can't be wrong also, bullpupmasterrace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shirtless Crackhead Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 What other countries? Countries like the U.K. and New Zealand? Who's special forces use AR15 platform rifles and not the standard issue regular army bullpups? Also, 1.3 billion people didn't make the decision, the group was much smaller than that. And they can totally be wrong. The question is what were the criteria they were trying to fill? The Chinese PLA has no intention of gearing up soldiers like we do, it doesn't fit their strategic model. That's why they'd get slaughtered in a manpower equal fight. They still rely on Korean War era human wave attacks in their Infantry strategies. Which won't work either because modern fire support, especially American fire support, will turn human wave attacks into goo faster than you can say HORY SHEET. Don't be mad the aesthetic styling of bullpups you find so pleasing to the eye doesn't equate into combat effectiveness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.